12 May
2007

ICCV Phase 1 reviewing finished

The first reviewing phase for the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) ended this weekend. This first page was intended to cull those papers that clearly didn't fit the ICCV template without even providing them with a full normal review. ICCV should accept a couple of hundred papers, but there were about 1200 submission, so culling some papers quickly is attractive. The downside is that some of these culled authors probably worked hard on their papers, but I appears that they won't get back complete reviews.

Posted by dudek at 13:47 May 12, 2007 | Read (1) or Leave a comment | permalink link to this entry |

<< Web sites overloaded with visits to (that number) | Main | Astonishing new proposals for copyright >>

Comments

Re: ICCV Phase 1 reviewing finished

whats the chances of getting paper accepted with
1 definite accept, 1 borderline and 1 weakly reject.

[ For ICCV, I think that's fairly bad news, but it depends also on the specifics of the review content. In general, the actual numerical scores are not completely reliable since the reviewers are not normalized with respect to one another. As a result, the area chairs have a lot of discretion. A paper with completely consistent and clear numerical scores has a well defined fate, but that is uncommon and otherwise it's a function of the specific text comments and the area chair's judgement. -gd ]

Posted by: anonymous at May 18,2009 10:57

Trackbacks

Please send trackback to:/blog/55/tbping

erbocle

bocboalbasou

Posted by: orcelolol at August 17,2009 11:38

Post your own response

Name or nickname:
(Some kind of name is required, will be visible)

Required, whatever you enter will be visible to other users.

Email Address:
(Optional, used for "mailto" link)

Your email address is not required, but if you insert it it will be displayed so people can contact you.

URL:
(Optional, will appear as a link)

Leave an URL if you want to provide a relevant link that relates to your comment or identifies you.

Title:

The title for your comment.

Comments:

Your comment goes here. All relevant comments are welcome, except for those that simply promote an irrelevant product or else are used to fraudulently inflate the link count to an irrelevant web page. Don't forget to also fill in the captcha below or your text will be rejected!

Captcha: You must answer this question to prove you are human
How many letters in the word: "LAMP"?

Answer this question correctly to demonstrate that you are not a dumb spambot.

Remember your info. on cookie?

Stop ACTA